Dead Man Walking Death Penalty Essay Against

The Issue Of Capital Punishment As In The Film Dead Man Walking

The Issue of Capital Punishment as in the film Dead Man Walking

In this essay I am going to analyse and explain how the issue of
Capital Punishment is portrayed in the film "Dead Man Walking", a true
story acted out.

Before I proceed with this essay, I think it necessary to give some
background information on Capital Punishment. Capital punishment, also
referred to as the death penalty, is the ordered execution of a
prisoner as a punishment for a serious crime. Prisoners are kept in an
isolated part of the prison, often-called Death Row, until the
execution date.

Methods of execution have varied over time and include; lethal
injection, decapitation (using a sword, axe or guillotine),
Electrocution (in an electric chair), hanging, gassing, strangulation,
drowning. Also used at some point were the methods of burning,
crucifixion, impalement, crushing, stoning, shooting by firing squad,
disembowelment, sawing, tearing apart by horses, devouring by wild
animals and crushing by an elephant. The most common method of
execution these days is lethal injection. 111 countries out of the
estimated 193 on earth do not practice Capital Punishment, but in 30
of the remaining known countries do practice Capital Punishment. In
the US 895 people have been executed from 1976 to 2003.

The story of the "Dead Man Walking" is as follows. A convicted killer
on Death Row called Matthew Poncelet has been sentenced to death by
lethal injection. He has committed the crime of attacking two
teenagers, a boy, and a girl, raping the girl then killing them both.
He writes to Christian nun, Sister Helen Prejean and asks her to find
him a decent lawyer in hope of changing his death sentence to a
sentence of life imprisonment. Sister Helen is unsure having not done
anything like this before. She isn't sure what she is getting herself
into, nevertheless she agrees to go and see him.

Capital Punishment is not used in the United Kingdom, but is used in
the United States. There are many arguments for Capital Punishment. A
popular argument for Capital Punishment is that having criminals
executed deters crime because, other people will not break the law in
fear of being executed. One other argument is that families of the
victim/s can have peace of mind and achieve revenge ion the criminal.
In "Dead Man Walking" Mr Percy, a victims dad says

"I'm going to watch you fry, watch you sizzle"

This right of having revenge on a person who has committed a crime on
you stems from the extensively quoted biblical text,

"an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth" which means if someone, for
example, stabs you it is quite all right for you to stab them back.
This quote is used as an argument in "Dead Man Walking". Another
religious quote used in the film supporting Capital Punishment is ,

"Those who live by the...

Loading: Checking Spelling


Read more

Dead Man Walking Essay

1100 words - 4 pages DEAD MAN WALKING      Dead Man Walking is a great book that deals with one of our nations most controversial issues: capital punishment. The books narrator, Sister Helen Prejean, discusses her personal views on capital punishment. She was a spiritual advisor and friend to two death row inmates; Elmo Patrick Sonnier and Robert Lee Willie. From her experiences, she developed views on the death penalty. She believed it...

Dead Man Walking Essay

1006 words - 4 pages Dead Man Walking      The film “Dead Man Walking” is a film about redemption. The film is directed by Tim Robbins. Susan Sarandon plays a Nun called Sister Helen Prejean. She is asked by a convicted murderer to get him a lawyer, and then later is asked to be his spiritual advisor. The convicted killer is named Matthew Poncelet, and he is played by Sean Penn. The film is set in the Angola state penitentiary, in...

Dead man walking

1048 words - 4 pages People in society today have changed their feelings towards humanity and religious practises. This change is seen clearly in the movie "Dead Man Walking." The characters go through changes in their view of religion and their feelings about human morality and humanity towards each other. The characters of Sister Helen,

Analysis of the Controversial Issue of Capital Punishment

2444 words - 10 pages The Controversial Issue of Capital Punishment     Capital punishment is a declining institution as the twentieth century nears its end. At one time capital punishment was a common worldwide practice, but now it is only used for serious violation of laws in 100 of the world's 180 nations (Haines 3 ). It can be traced back to the earliest forms of civilization. The origins of the movement away from capital punishment are difficult to date ...

Sister Helen Prejean's Dead Man Walking

1421 words - 6 pages Sister Helen Prejean's Dead Man Walking Dead Man Walking was an autobiography written by Sister Helen Prejean. The novel tells about Prejean's life in dealing with her intimate journey through her dealings with capital punishment. Prejean was a Roman Catholic nun that worked in St. Thomas. She worked in a New Orleans housing project for black residents. In January of 1982, Prejean was asked to be a pen pal with a death row inmate named...

How does the director, Pete Weir, shape our response to the issue of conformity versus individualism in the film Dead Poets Society?

829 words - 3 pages 370791XStage 1: EnglishHow does the director, Pete Weir, shape our response to the issue of conformity versus individualism in the film Dead Poets Society? Respond to the question in an essay.In the film Dead Poets Society there are two main issues that are focused upon. These two issues include the battle between whether conformity or individualism is right. We are shown...

Capital Punishment - A Complex Social Issue

3808 words - 15 pages Should the government abolish capital punishment? This is a question that has plagued the United States since its birth, as it is a complex social issue not easily resolved. The law, society, and many religious institutions consider life to be precious. Also, because capital punishment is irreversible, an innocent life could potentially be at stake in the pursuit of justice. Groups that are opposed to the death penalty – such as...

The Walking Dead

1353 words - 5 pages The Walking Dead, a television show about surviving in the zombie world, is based on the comic book with the same name created by Robert Kirkman. In this show Rick Grimes, a sheriff's deputy, awakes from his coma and finds himself in a hospital. He soon discovers that while he was in a coma the world had become infected, turning humans into flesh-eating zombies later called Walkers by the characters. As Rick sets out to find his family he...

Minority Trope Representation in AMC’s The Walking Dead

2659 words - 11 pages The Walking Dead is a television show produced by AMC based off the black and white comic books by Robert Kirkman. The show and comic book center around main character Rick Grimes as he learns to cope with life after waking up from a deadly wound into an outbreak of virus wielding undead creatures known as “walkers.” Over the course of season two and season three, the show starts to center around how Rick is able to command the group of survivors...

The Abolishment Of Capital Punishment In Australia

507 words - 2 pages Capital Punishment is punishment of a crime by death. The death penalty was abolished in Queensland in 1922, New South Wales in 1955, Tasmania in 1968, Victoria in 1975, South Australia in 1976 and Western Australia in 1984. Since that time debate has raged as whether or not capital punishment should be re-introduced. This essay examines the case for and...

The Abolition of Capital Punishment in Australia

1218 words - 5 pages Since the last execution in Australia in 1967 of Ronald Ryan and the abolition of capital punishment in Australia in 1973 imprisonment has been the only option as a sanction for murder. A survey conducted in 2009 demonstrated that a clear majority of Australians (64%) believed that imprisonment should be the punishment for murder as opposed to 23% stating the death penalty should be used and 13% did not wish to comment. The death penalty is not...

WRAC Online


Example Critique Essay

English 1A

Assignment: The following essay is a critique of the book Dead Man Walking by Sister Helen Prejean, focusing on the persuasiveness of the author’s argument.

[Instructor's comments appear in bold, italic font within brackets below.]

The Death Penalty: From a Critic’s Point of View

Imagine that there is power invested in you to decide the fate of a vicious murderer who has ruthlessly tortured and killed two teenagers: What would you do? Would you sentence him to death or life imprisonment? What are the bases for your judgment? This issue is not as hypothetical as one might think. In fact, it is very similar to real life events, and final judgments in cases like this have spurred heated debates between proponents and opponents of capital punishment. Some people—often victims’ relatives—favor the death penalty as a fair punishment, basing their bias on the Mosaic Law that requires “an eye for an eye” while others, like Helen Prejean, oppose the death penalty and question its appropriateness. Prejean is a Catholic nun, and a strong opponent of the death penalty, who established a legal entity in Louisiana to represent death-row inmates in their trials. In her book Dead Man Walking, Prejean assesses in details the issues concerning the death penalty; she analyses both the gruesome deeds of the murders alongside with the psychological pains the victims undergo prior their death and the pain and agony the victims’ family suffer, while she cleverly argues against the death penalty. Even though not all of her points were convincing, Prejean effectively argues against the death penalty. [Good intro to the topic and the book – You smoothly flow from general to specific, ending with your thesis]

As a counterargument to the claim that inmates executed suffer no pain, Prejean argues that death-row inmates are cruelly killed and they experience even more pain especially when they can tell the time and manner in which they will be killed. First, she relates a series of episodes that depict tremendous pain suffered by convicts. Seventeen-year-old Willie Francis is one of her examples: After several volts of electricity were applied on him, Francis survived but just to be executed an hour later (18-19). Then she claims that death-row inmates “suffer pain each time they look at the clock, knowing that their death is eminent” (234). Prejean’s argument is not strong enough to face the claims of her opposition. For one thing, many people do not care about how much the murderer suffers. Moreover, no one knows exactly the level of pain and agony that the victims suffer in the hands of their aggressors, therefore one cannot fairly tell who suffers the most pain—the victim or the victimizer. Thus, it is safe to say that the only accomplishment of Prejean’s argument is the acknowledgement of the pain suffered by the condemned murderer because her argument is not convincing enough to discourage the death penalty. [Good claim to evaluate – you might also add that many people won’t care how much a murderer suffers]. Nevertheless, Prejean shows a high level of efficiency in presenting her argument.

As a way of appealing to the emotions of her audience, Prejean starts her argument by relating the experience of a death-row inmate, Patrick Sonnier, whose story is as pitiful as that of his victims. She conveys Sonnier’s remorse even before explaining his deeds: “I shouldn’t have…get mixed up in the bad things we(were) doing. I will go to my grave feeling bad about those kids(his victims)….Every night I pray for those kids and their parents” (38). And she continues by justifying Sonnier’s exemption from death by relating Eddie’s words—Sonnier’s brother who was also involved in the murder—to the governor: “Please, Governor, you are about to kill the wrong man…I am the one who killed the teenagers” [Page number for this quote? Remember to always cite your source]. Prejean’s approach to the subject shows an exemplary use of pathos in an argument or debate. By starting with Sonnier’s account, Prejean paves the way for the central idea of her argument—the death penalty is immoral and unjust and therefore should be abolished. Indeed, she wins some amount of compassion for the death-row inmate from her audience, and this compassion allows the audience to give consideration to any further points she might bring out. Perhaps if she started by relating the gruesome deeds of the death-row inmate, her audience would probably have opted for the “eye for an eye” rule, that the murderer deserves death. But to prevent such a whimsical conclusion, Prejean cleverly chooses an approach that will hopefully allow her points to be put across. Obviously, putting her points across requires a mutual understanding between Prejean and her opposition, and this is exactly what she always strive to do.

Another factor that makes Prejean’s argument effective is the neutral ground she often seeks with her opposition. She makes it known that she does not condone the actions of the death row inmates and refers to them as “totally wrong and inhumane,” a view point that her opposition shares. During one of her visits with the Harveys, one victim’s family, Prejean says, “Hearing the details of Faith’s vicious murder, I find myself sucked into the Harveys’ rage” (145). [Good use of the text to prove your point.] Her condemnation of the deed of the death-row inmate does not relinquish her stance against the death penalty. Rather it shows respect for the stance of her opposition. But why would someone who condemns the vicious deed of a murderer not support the death penalty? [Good question!] Her response to this question strengthens Prejean’s argument even more: “If we believe that murder is wrong and is not admissible in our society, then it has to be wrong for everyone, not just individuals but governments as well” (130). Prejean at one instance sheds tears as one victim’s family explains the ruthless murder of their daughter (187). This neutral point of view allows Prejean to state precisely why she condemns the death penalty. It gives her the opportunity to make known to her opposition that it is the ‘act of killing’ that she hates, not the killer. Indeed she questions the morality of the death penalty as a just punishment for murder. If Prejean had not sought the common terms that exist between herself and her opposition, that they both condemn murder, she definitely would have been misunderstood to be a supporter of murderers, and disrespected. However, because she followed the right course, her stance is not only understood but she also gains respect from her opposition. One of Prejean’s strong opposition states, “We are like different baseball teams. [We have] different point of view but we respect each other” (172). Such a remark from her opposition shows that she deeply regards the ethics of others. Yet to pursue her goal in convincing her audience that the death penalty should be abolished, Prejean has to do more that just appealing emotionally to her audience or gaining the respect of her opposition. [This last sentence works well to sum up the arguments of your first two body paragraphs and transition to your last (and most important) point, but you could say more to explain why these approaches alone are not enough for Prejean to make her case.]

Prejean now brings out statistical facts that logically and effectively support her argument against the death penalty. In emphasizing the cost of killing one inmate, Prejean states, “In Florida(for example), which may be typical, each death sentence is estimated to cost approximately $3.18 million, compared to the cost of life imprisonment (40 years) of about $516,000” (129). This cost she says comes from hiring ‘expert’ witnesses and investigators, the cost of sequestering the jury, and many other protocols involved in a capital case. In addition to the financial cost, Prejean argues that society loses morally—the cost of losing one more person in death. The biggest counter-argument of her opposition is that killing the murderer will prevent future crimes. But as Prejean’s statistical evidence bring out, by no means has the death penalty deterred murder crimes (52). This argument is clearly logical because if it is this expensive to kill a murderer, then it should behoove the government to sentence him/her to life imprisonment, which will allow him/her the opportunity to defray the cost of his or her own living. And if killing the murderer does not prevent future crimes, then the reason for abolishing the death penalty gets even stronger. Undeniably, then, one can conclude that Prejean was able to use statistical evidence to effectively present her argument. [Yes, well put, but why is this factual evidence so important to her argument?]

In the society we live in, the death penalty continues to be one of the most controversial issues. Some favor it while other oppose; but the underlying fact is that either our individual beliefs or the effects that the death penalty might have on us shape our different viewpoints regarding this issue. As for Prejean, her religious background probably motivated her stance against the death penalty; in any case, she effectively agues her stance against the death penalty and gives some solid reasons for its abolition. [It would be good to go back into detail on your assessment of her argument] But regardless of one’s support or disapproval of the death penalty, our choices and opinions always depict who we really are. Are we justice seekers or red-blooded villains? Are we respecters of moral rights or coddlers of murders? Prejean shows that she does not hate murderer but the ‘act of murder’. So the next time you are asked to state your opinion about the death penalty, give thought to who or what your answer will depict you to be.

Instructor end comment:

[A solid essay! You carefully point to some of the key ideas behind Prejean’s argument and are starting to do a fine job of evaluating the quality of her argument, though your last body paragraph could be more in depth. My main suggestion would be for you to develop more in your conclusion your overall assessment of Prejean’s argument, thereby underscoring the thesis of your paper.]

** Minor mechanical errors/typos have been corrected by the creators of CHARLIE

0 Thoughts to “Dead Man Walking Death Penalty Essay Against

Leave a comment

L'indirizzo email non verrà pubblicato. I campi obbligatori sono contrassegnati *